The Wandsworth Prison Error: What the Latest UK Justice Scandal Reveals
The UK’s prison system is under renewed scrutiny following the wrongful release of a convicted sex offender from HMP Wan...
Today, the court cleared Tommy Robinson of a terrorism-related charge after he refused to provide police with the password to his mobile phone during a stop at the Channel Tunnel terminal in July 2024. The stop was carried out under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000, which enables officers to detain people at UK ports to determine whether they may be involved in terrorism.
In handing down his verdict, Judge Sam Goozée said he could not ignore that the stop appeared to have been motivated by Robinson’s political beliefs rather than any evidence of terrorist activity. He described the police’s rationale as legally inadequate and found the detention unlawful.
Robinson had argued that his phone contained “journalistic material” and that forcing him to hand over the PIN would infringe on his rights. He also publicly thanked US-billionaire Elon Musk, who he said supported his legal defence.
The verdict raises significant questions about the application of counter-terror powers: how police identify reasonable suspicion, how rights of journalists are protected, and how political beliefs interplay with law-enforcement decisions.
This case may prompt review of how Schedule 7 is used at ports and whether the threshold for stopping individuals is being applied correctly.
Sources: The Guardian, Financial Times, Reuters
This notice has been removed
The content is no longer available
Today, the court cleared Tommy Robinson of a terrorism-related charge after he refused to provide police with the password to his mobile phone during a stop at the Channel Tunnel terminal in July 2024. The stop was carried out under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000, which enables officers to detain people at UK ports to determine whether they may be involved in terrorism.
In handing down his verdict, Judge Sam Goozée said he could not ignore that the stop appeared to have been motivated by Robinson’s political beliefs rather than any evidence of terrorist activity. He described the police’s rationale as legally inadequate and found the detention unlawful.
Robinson had argued that his phone contained “journalistic material” and that forcing him to hand over the PIN would infringe on his rights. He also publicly thanked US-billionaire Elon Musk, who he said supported his legal defence.
The verdict raises significant questions about the application of counter-terror powers: how police identify reasonable suspicion, how rights of journalists are protected, and how political beliefs interplay with law-enforcement decisions.
This case may prompt review of how Schedule 7 is used at ports and whether the threshold for stopping individuals is being applied correctly.
Sources: The Guardian, Financial Times, Reuters
No results found
Try a different search term
Something went wrong
No notices yet
No notices match these filters
Couldn't load notices
You're all caught up 🎉
Sign in to continue to Global Noticeboard
Enter your email to receive a reset link
Create a new password for your account
You are marking this Notice are inappropriate, and you belive it infringes on the Global Noticeboard Community Guidelines (link). Is this so?
Create 3 Noticeboards to earn this Silver level Community Champion Badge.
View all badges that you can earnPlease tell us why you are reporting this content.
Discussion (0)
No comments yet